« Fixing the Mortgage Liquidity Problem | Main | Getting the Mortgage Mess Behind Us »

August 17, 2007



640 may be a bit high for a "no stated income" cutoff point. For example, some very successful real estate investors make most of their money by borrowing against equity (showing net losses on tax returns), and use too much credit for their scores to be that high, in spite of spotless payment records and a large "war chest" of available funds.

I think making the loans available, but modifying the rates to cover the risks is a better option, especially if someone can provide bank statement proof they have enough money coming in.

It is certainly true that a lot of blatantly ridiculous loans have been made, and should not continue to be made... but let's not toss the baby with the bath water right yet.

Will business credit lines become the new mortgages for professional investors?

Dick Lepre


I am hardly suggesting that my numbers are the result of some finely tuned process and the economic equivalent of Maxwell's Equations. I am suggesting something to get this parked car moving again.

I am deliberatley erring on the side of caution because, frankly, I do not think that anything else will work at present.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)